NHS Dentistry: Britain’s Dental Crisis, How We Got Here and What Needs to Be Done

In a departure from my usual history studies, I’ve decided to explore the history of NHS dentistry and its challenges today. This is a topic I follow closely in the news, as I believe the profession urgently needs support to survive within the NHS. To construct this week’s post, I’ve examined government reviews, surveys, and guidance from the British Dental Association and General Dental Council. I aim to summarise the key issues facing NHS dentistry and highlight potential solutions for its future.

Reading time: 12 - 15 minutes

___________________________________________________________________________________

 NHS Dentistry is struggling. Fewer appointments, a small number of dentists providing treatment, and not enough education institutes are just some of the problems facing our national health service today. As someone who has benefitted from the system, preserving this service is in our national interest. In the work below, I shall explore the history of the service and how the various challenges it faces today may impact its future. From this, it will become clear what our crisis state is and how we should fix it.

 

The History of Dentistry as A Field in Britain

Unlike medicine and surgery, Dentists did not have qualifications until the 1850s. Their history as a ‘modern’ profession can be traced to 1858 when the Dental Hospital of London and the Metropolitan School of Dental Science opened their doors.[1] This expanded to Edinburgh, Glasgow, and Ireland by 1879—a relatively fast expansion for what is now a demanding course.[2] The inclusion of Edinburgh is quite interesting, as today, the university only focuses on post-graduate specialist courses (something I shall return to later).[3] Dentistry, then, can be seen as a niche, requiring much time and support to study. This factor is only affirmed by the requirement to study at both a dental school and a medical school in the late 19th century.[4] These requirements were later phased out; dentists today typically study a Bachelor of Dental Surgery (BDS), the first of which was awarded at Birmingham in 1906.[5] The qualification development was relatively rapid; in a fifty-year window, the nation went from not having qualified dentists to having schools producing professionals. The development as such was remarkable, and whilst it could have had a limited impact on the population – with dentistry being private at this point, it established it as a ‘profession.’

The greatest asset of Dentistry in Britain was its introduction to the National Health Service (NHS) in 1948. The NHS is the UK’s medical service and was established in 1946 by the Labour Party’s Minister for Health, Aneurin Bevan MP.[6] The NHS was revolutionary at the time, founded on improving physical and mental health and preventing, diagnosing and treating illness.[7] At its introduction in 1948, NHS Dentistry was free, but this was only short-lived, as charges were introduced in 1951. Charges are, to an extent, necessary to ensure the payment of practitioners and materials, a theme that only develops from the introduction. So, by the 1960s, charges were seen per item, and a backlog in war-time issues and a development in dental technologies saw the move from extracting teeth to restoring them.[8] Kevin Lewis has coined this shift to restorative practices, which has seen a ‘heavy metal’ approach to the nation’s teeth.[9] Like my parents, those who grew up in the 1960s – 1980s often seem to have many amalgam fillings. This is, again, part of the restorative practice that was brought in under the profession and implemented by the NHS. The profession focuses more on restorative and preventative care than removing teeth today. As such, the growth of the NHS increased the nation’s access to oral health provisions. In essence, this was a positive thing.

 

NHS Dentistry Today

In 2023, approximately 23,577 dentists were completing NHS work in England.[10] A number nowhere near large enough to serve a population of 57 million.[11] As Lewis shows, the NHS completed the work of those in the 1960s-1980s generation, and realistically, there is less provision to support their restorative work today. In addition to only 23,577 dentists practising, as of June 2023, only 40.7% of adults had seen an NHS dentist, compared to 50.9% in September 2019 and 51.7% in 2006.[12] A reduction in service over the long term suggests we are heading for the end of this subsidised care as we know it in England. The lack of provisions is alarming. With a growing population, a reliance on restorations being maintained, and a desire to prevent future generations needing said restorations, something must be done.

This lack of provision is a concern as restorations have lifespans. For example, the average lifespan for an amalgam filling is around 15 to 20 years. For example, if you had one placed on the NHS in 1990, by 2010, the provision for NHS dentistry would have crumbled. The 2006 contract made the provider (the dentist) agree to complete a set amount of dental activity annually.[13] This was measured in units of dental activity (UDAs) and is problematic at best. For example, dentists could only see so many patients on this, allowing private practice to develop. By 2010 onwards, as per my example, a patient would likely be required to pay a higher fee for more specialist work. Those who aren’t dentally minded may not understand that more of the tooth's enamel is removed when a restoration, such as a filling, is placed. This can lead to teeth being overly filled and needing to be crowned/capped instead. Institutions like the NHS are essential to maintaining oral health and preventing more complex work like crowns.

Whilst a blessing for the nation in its provisions, the NHS only provides treatment with specific materials and in a banding system. There are three bands, all providing a variety of treatments ranging from basic to more complex. Under the current charges, Band 1 costs £26.80, Band 2 costs £73.50, and Band 3 costs £319.10.[14] These are much lower than the private comparison. For example, someone who attends a basic check-up (Band 1) and is found to require one or more fillings and likely have x-rays taken (Band 2) will only pay for Band 2. However, this applies only if the treatment is carried out within two months of the first appointment.  By comparison, a private fee for treatment like this would incur the initial appointment fee (anywhere up from £49) and the fee for each filling (likely around £150 - £200+ depending on material), and x-rays too (likely £20+). So, in total, the NHS patient pays £73.50, whilst the private patient pays somewhere in the region of £200+ for a single filling. The main pro of the NHS system is ensuring everyone gets access to treatment at a price most can afford without neglecting problems. However, the materials used on the NHS are solely amalgam (with very few exceptions, i.e. you are under 15, you have deciduous (milk teeth), pregnant or breastfeeding).[15] This can be seen as unesthetic, so a patient has more choice with private treatment—such as using white composite. Therefore, the NHS is limited in what it can provide, but it benefits the patient financially.

The lack of provisions has led to the creation of ‘dental deserts’, most notably in the East. As you shall see below in ‘The Current State of Dental Schools’, most dental schools are centred in municipal areas, predominantly in the North and some in the Midlands. As one consultant Oral Surgeon put it, “It makes me so angry – daily, I see some of the most vulnerable being abandoned. […] in a return to health outcomes of the 1940s.” Other examples include Wisbech and Suffolk. In Suffolk, suggested plans for remote dental care are being discussed with hopes of losing this tag by their health board boss within 2 years.[16] Much change is needed to achieve this. The NHS is underfunded and needs more provisions to survive, such as schools, personnel, and funding. As such, the lack of patient access currently leaves people in crisis.

With the limited scope of provisions established under the 2006 contract, can we call the Conservative Government’s plan a ‘recovery plan’? The 2024 plan aimed to create 2.5 million additional appointments next year and give dentists a ‘golden hello’ incentive to work in underserved areas.[17] However, the 2015-2016 study found dentists often struggled to see 55% of the nation annually.[18] Increasing appointments won’t do anything unless we have the means to support this. This would mean increased government funding in line with the approaches in Scotland, and they would enjoy a very generous NHS treatment system at a much lower cost. In their defence, they pay a little bit more in taxes. The Labour government are tasked with the delicate balance of increasing taxes to do this or face up to the fact that repairing the NHS may be too complex in its current state. The state of NHS Dentistry is, therefore, in a precarious place.

 

The State of Britain’s Oral Health

The state of Britain’s oral health is currently relatively good. According to a recent global health survey, Britain ranked second among countries most likely to attend a dentist regularly.[19] 42% of participants reported that they regularly attend their appointments.[20] This aligns with the number of patients who receive NHS appointments and is a good measure of the number of people attending. However, the more pressing matter is that a country can be seen as in good health, with only 42% of respondents attending appointments. Whilst this is likely from a small sample size, it is suprisingly low to rank second. Considering the points about restorations needing to be maintained, we should aim to increase this number. In this case, a system like NHS dentistry can be highly beneficial.

The case for increasing appointment attendance can be further seen through the current state of adult’s teeth. The 2021 Adult Oral Health survey highlights dentate adults having, on average, 25.4 natural teeth. The survey also found that of those surveyed, 77% brush their teeth twice a day, and at least half use an electric toothbrush.[21] This is a good start and suggests that education in oral health programmes impacts the extent of good habits. As part of the survey, 6,343 responses were recorded between February and March 2021 from a representative selection of adults aged 16 and over across England. One part of the survey asked respondents to report on the state of their teeth and count the number of restorations. These were fillings (‘filled teeth’), crowns (‘crowned teeth’) and having had a ‘root canal’. The proportion of adults aged 55-64 had the highest number of filled teeth, with around 95% of respondents having filled teeth. This was the highest of any other group. It also supports Lewis’ point about those who grew up between 1960 and 1980 having more fillings under a restorative focus on ‘drilling and filling.’[22] Being so common in this category alone, these restorations indicate the need for increased appointment attendance. The NHS, as such, should be carefully funded to help maintain the nation's health to a set standard.



Figure 1. A copy of Figure 6 from the Adult oral health survey showing respondents aged 16 to 75+ and their restorative work. (accessed via: https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/adult-oral-health-survey-2021/adult-oral-health-survey-2021-self-reported-health-of-teeth-and-gums)

Furthermore, the case for the mean number of filled teeth in each age group demonstrates the need for observation. According to the survey, adults aged 16 – 24 had around 1.4 filled teeth, while adults aged 55 -74 had an average of 6.5 and 6.6. Again, this asserts the need to improve the NHS system to maintain all completed treatments. Of those with filled teeth, around 80% of respondents attended their appointments regularly (i.e., every 6-9 months), and 70% went occasionally – a slight decrease – before rising to 75% of those with filled teeth who only went when having issues.[23] This slight increase in those who only attend when experiencing issues should implore us to find ways to increase access and ensure that people actively engage with their oral health by attending these appointments. It cannot be any more urgent than in the cases of dental deserts where people have extracted their teeth. Dangerous practices risk increasing if we do not offer more appointments and, most importantly, encourage people to use them.





Figure 2. A copy of Figure 9 from the Adult oral health survey showing respondents’ attendance at appointments (accessed via: https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/adult-oral-health-survey-2021/adult-oral-health-survey-2021-self-reported-health-of-teeth-and-gums)

 

Some individuals may also have unreported dental anxieties, preventing them from attending regular appointments. This also needs to be tackled so anxious patients don’t lose access to an NHS dentist under the current 24-month rule – in which if you do not attend, you are removed from the practice books. Whilst the overall appearance of Britain’s oral health seems to be good in the short term, we should be more concerned with long-term planning to maintain this. Therefore, the current system's state needs to change for the better – both for the professionals and the patients.

 

The Current State of Dental Schools

The number of dental school places is an issue. As of this writing, there are 11 dental schools in England, 2 in Scotland, 1 in Northern Ireland, and 1 in Wales. These schools had a combined entry projection for 2024/2025 of 1,107 spaces (see Tables 1 and 2). By comparison, 35 institutions alone in England offered 7,048 Medicine spaces.[24] Medicine spaces are thereby almost 7x higher than dentistry spaces. Whilst future doctors are essential to the NHS, as the majority will work here, there should be a further focus on the number of places offered to study dentistry, too.

In addition, dentistry is often seen as an elitist subject where fewer places can harm its applications. Today's average applicant is 19.7 years old and female; over half of applicants are from minority ethnic groups.[25] The high entry requirements of AAA to A*AA often mean those of a lower socioeconomic background are unlikely to gain the grades needed for entry. While around 15% of applicants are graduates (applying for their second degree), the lack of spaces and high entry requirements may indicate an issue with school spaces.[26] The average age being past 18 – the age of sitting A-Levels – indicates significant demand for this degree, and more should be done to accommodate those wishing to study it. More spaces are needed to widen the sector and help overcome the issues facing the NHS today.[27]

One way to achieve this is through opening more dental schools. The University of East Anglia in Norwich is set to open its first dental school later this year.[28] Located in the East of England, a school here could retain graduates to help in its dental ‘desert’ of both Norfolk and Suffolk.[29] As shown in Figure 3 and Figure 4, the distribution of dental schools across the country is primarily centred in London, the north and north-west, but the development of a dental school in East Anglia would further oral health provisions in the area. Students would be required to undertake clinical hours within the local community, which could help to reduce the waiting list for the NHS. Furthermore, this would increase the number of dental school places in the UK and likely add between 50 and 70 new dentists to the UK’s health service each year.[30] UEA already has a medical school, which would align it with the other universities and could inspire other institutions with medical schools to follow suit. This, however, is a slow process which must be supported by the General Dental Council for the University to gain the relevant statuses to teach and award degrees. It can, however, be hoped that examples such as UEA will inspire more universities to consider developing adjacent dental schools to help ‘fill’ (pun intended) the situation. This way, more dentists will be trained and, therefore, can be recruited by the NHS.



Figure 3: A map showing the distribution of medical schools only (blue) and medical and dental schools (red). Created via Google My Maps.

 



Figure 4: A map showing the distribution of medical schools only (blue) and medical and dental schools (red) in London. Created via Google My Maps.

 

Dental schools and their fees should also be considered for the future of NHS dentistry. Currently, all home students pay the same fee regardless of their cost. However, students studying dentistry in a 5 – 6-year course are eligible for funding from the NHS Bursary scheme. Here, they can get their fifth year of tuition fees paid by the NHS.[31] The UK government estimates that it costs £292,000 to train a dentist from the beginning of dental school to graduation.[32] In repayment terms, students owe £94,000 in tuition loans to the Student Loans Company. As such, dental students benefit from training supported by their universities and the government over their fees. It seems fair to tie in their training to an NHS post. The government believes that as part of the NHS long-term working plan (LTWP), there is a need for this as it is estimated that by 2031, 1,100 dentists will be being trained each year, up from 810 (approx.).[33] There is currently concern that many practising dentists aren’t giving NHS treatment. This needs rectification, and graduates should be encouraged to participate in the NHS service. It does not need to be an extended policy but should aim to secure an investment return, for example. This can be seen as helping to ‘balance’ the difference between their funding and the fees they pay, therefore offering services to the NHS, which desperately needs to increase the number of patients being seen.

As such, dental schools and their challenges can be a good place to focus on the NHS recovery plan. Schools should expand and provide stronger links for graduates to join NHS contracts. Through this, we can help secure the investment in each undergraduate and strengthen the NHS’s future workforce.

 

How should we fix it?

To conclude, the problems of NHS dentistry are unlikely to disappear overnight. Careful planning is needed on all levels, from the government to the dental schools themselves, and collaboration with today's and tomorrow's dentists is essential. I believe this is necessary to maintain Britain’s oral health. An abundance of restorative work in some generations means careful observation and minor maintenance may be needed. This work was likely placed under NHS, and it seems only right to maintain it. Expanding dental schools will provide new training opportunities and widen participation in local communities after graduation. Government initiatives will increase student places and ensure we have a capable dental workforce for the future. These measures will ensure the survival of elements of NHS dentistry, but only if we act now.


What do you think, can NHS dentistry be saved? If so, how far can these measures help that? 


Table 1: UK Dental Schools, their regions served and the number of places available

Dental School / Affiliated University

Region Served

Number of Home Places for Entry (Y1)

Queen’s University Belfast

Northern Ireland

45

University of Birmingham

West Midlands, England

67

University of Bristol

South West, England

67

University of Cardiff

Wales

74

University of Dundee

Scotland

135

University of Glasgow

Scotland

67

University of Leeds

West Yorkshire, England

72

University of Liverpool

North West, England

68

King’s College London

London, England

141

Queen Mary University of London

London, England

67

University of Manchester

North West, England

67

University of Newcastle

North West, England

67

University of Plymouth

South West, England

55

University of Sheffield

South Yorkshire, England

67

University of Aberdeen

Scotland

20

University of Central Lancashire

North West, England

28

 

Key:

 

Post-Graduate Entry Only

 

Undergraduate & Post-Graduate Entry

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Table 2:

Medical School

Region Served

Number of Home Places for Entry (Y1)

Anglia Ruskin University

East of England

100

Aston University

West Midlands

100

University of Birmingham

West Midlands

372

Universities of Brighton and Sussex

South East England

193

University of Bristol

South West England

251

Brunel University London

London

50

University of Cambridge

East of England

291

University of Central Lancashire

North West England

50

University of Chester

North West England

50

University of East Anglia

East of England

195

Edge Hill University

North West England

50

University of Exeter

South West England

208

Universities of Hull and York

Yorkshire & the Humber

220

Imperial College London

London

321

Keele University

West Midlands

154

Universities of Kent and Canterbury Christ Church

South East England

100

King’s College London

London

346

Lancaster University

North West England

125

University of Leeds

Yorkshire & the Humber

259

University of Leicester

East Midlands

80

University of Nottingham: Lincoln Medical School

North West England

309

University of Liverpool

North West England

369

University of Manchester

North West England

341

Newcastle University

East Midlands

346

University of Oxford

South East England

186

University of Plymouth

South West England

150

King’s College London: University of Portsmouth Branch

South East England

54

Queen Mary University of London

London

347

St George’s Hospital Medical School

London

260

University of Sheffield

Yorkshire & the Humber

288

University of Southampton

South East England

243

University of Sunderland

North East England

100

University College London

London

310

University of Warwick

West Midlands

180

University of Worcester

West Midlands

50

 

Key:

 

Also has a dental school

 

Medical school only

 

Sources for Table 1:

https://www.bda.org/advice/career-hub/how-to-become-a-dentist/dental-schools/

https://www.officeforstudents.org.uk/for-providers/finance-and-funding/health-education-funding/medical-and-dental-maximum-fundable-limits/

https://www.abdn.ac.uk/dental/study/bds/#:~:text=With%20only%2020%20places%20available,study%20and%20practical%20patient%20care.

https://www.sfc.ac.uk/publications/university-intake-targets-for-dentistry-2024-25/

https://www.cardiff.ac.uk/documents/2839846-admissions-information-for-studying-dentistry-at-cardiff#:~:text=We%20have%20had%20over%201500,on%20each%20programme%20can%20change.

 

Source for Table 2:

https://www.officeforstudents.org.uk/for-providers/finance-and-funding/health-education-funding/medical-and-dental-maximum-fundable-limits/

 



[1] Gelbier, S. 125 years of developments in dentistry, 1880–2005 Part 5: Dental education, training and qualifications. Br Dent J 199, 685–689 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4813002

[2] Gelbier, S. 125 years of developments in dentistry, 1880–2005 Part 5: Dental education, training and qualifications. Br Dent J 199, 685–689 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4813002

[3] https://www.bda.org/advice/career-hub/how-to-become-a-dentist/dental-schools/

[4] Gelbier, S. 125 years of developments in dentistry, 1880–2005 Part 5: Dental education, training and qualifications. Br Dent J 199, 685–689 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4813002

[5] Gelbier, S. 125 years of developments in dentistry, 1880–2005 Part 5: Dental education, training and qualifications. Br Dent J 199, 685–689 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4813002

[19] https://www.bakerstreetdental.com/blog/uk-performs-well-in-recent-global-dental-health-survey/

[21] https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/adult-oral-health-survey-2021/adult-oral-health-survey-2021-report-summary#:~:text=The%20main%20findings%20of%20the,natural%20tooth%20(were%20dentate).

[23] https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/adult-oral-health-survey-2021/adult-oral-health-survey-2021-self-reported-health-of-teeth-and-gums

[24] See table 1 and table 2 for sources

[25] Booth, A., Hurry, K. & Abela, S. The current dental school applicant: an overview of the admission process for UK dental schools and the sociodemographic status of applicants. Br Dent J 232, 172–176 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41415-022-3927-1

[26] Booth, A., Hurry, K. & Abela, S. The current dental school applicant: an overview of the admission process for UK dental schools and the sociodemographic status of applicants. Br Dent J 232, 172–176 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41415-022-3927-1

[30] Calculated from data in Table 1 (not including Post-Graduate Entry Only universities and universities located outside of England.)

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

“Tradition!” amongst Trauma: Fiddler on the Roof as Memory of Jewish Life in Tsarist Russia

Starmer’s Immigration Policies – The Crumbling State of English Universities and the Growing Need for Reassessment

The Value of Studying History: A Subject at Risk